Recently, I published a post titled Can You Sincerely Believe in Something If You Have Never Doubted or Questioned It?, it was a repose to a blog post by Christian blogger Kansas City Bob about the "Idol of Certainty". I had said that I can't really see how a belief in anything, politics, etc, but especially religion can be a personal belief, a true and powerful part of someone's identity if they have never seriously questioned it or doubted it at some point.
Blogger Jack Vance had this to say in response to the post:
Not only question the maturity of it, but the strength of it? How strong
can someone's beliefs be when held up to questioning and opposition if
someone has never questioned and tested it?
I think that was
kind of a fatal flaw of the current fundamentalist system. Fundies like
to blame secular colleges for their kids leaving the faith, as though
professors are actively trying to de-convert students (you of all people
would know that's the farthest from the truth), (Sheldon's note: Jack Vance is a university professor in Mississippi) but it's not the
colleges that are leading to the de conversions, it's being allowed to
experience the outside world for the first time, being exposed to all
varieties of people, and realizing that the world doesn't fit in a nice
little fundamentalist box, and that some people aren't as bad as they
were lead to think.Their faith is being confronted with reality, and it
has never been questioned by reality before. They've never asked the
hard questions about their faith, because they haven't been outside of
fundie land, and never been faced with questions before.
the forced isolation is not only destructive, but counter productive to
the efforts of thew parents to keep their children in the faith. Because
their faith has never had to face the hard questions of life before,
you end up with young students that know their faith well, and can
repeat all the lines and canned arguments, but their faith has never
been hardened by being exposed to outsiders, and facing the hard
questions that facing reality will bring about.
They have never had to ask "Is this truly what I believe?" because they have never had to make the choice to believe.
Any normal, rational person can see how isolating a child from the outside world is harmfully psychologically, and that kind of closed environment is a fertile breeding ground for abuse (if you can't see it, just spend about 30 minutes on Homeschoolers Anonymous, if that doesn't convince you, I don't know what will).
feel like a foreigner in their own country, and have a hard time coping as adults, but that their efforts in trying to keep their children in the faith well into adulthood (which they think will happen by keeping the out of the corrupting influences of "the world"), are actually counter productive.
Let me explain. I sincerely believe that in order for a faith to be real, and personal to someone, a major part of their internal identity, they have to at some point question what they believe. Without questioning, the faith is merely what that person believes due to the fact that it is all they have ever known in their culture, or just what they have believed due to the fact that is the way they have always seen the world, and they don't want to change that fact.
To me, genuine faith can not come about without questioning, or doubting at some point, without it, it can't true representation of who that person is, and what they believe with every fiber of their being. Questioning usually comes about as a result when someone is questioned about their faith, or confronted with new perspectives that they have not encountered before.
Neither of which can happen if someone has never been exposed to the outside world.
When a person raised in such an environment finally has to go out and be in the outside culture, whether that be in the workplace, college, etc, their faith gets shaken even harder than it would have been had they ever been allowed the opportunity to question, because though in some cases, question leads to an abandoning of the faith (like in my case), if someone can sincerely question the faith, and still decide to remain in it, it comes out on the other side as a much stronger faith than before.
Fundamentalists don't seem to understand this, and they are scared of questioning, they try to limit their children's exposure to the outside world to keep them from questioning, and it ends up creating a generation of people, who until they are able to walk away from such an environment, don't even know how to question and explore their beliefs.
It's a very closed culture where outside ideas are not allowed in, questioning isn't just discouraged, but up to a point, the very concept of it doesn't exist. Questioning is only allowed, and can only be comprehended in very limited ways. When taught how to debate, they are only taught how to use certain talking points to back up what they already believe, with consideration ever given to the possibility that what is taught is wrong on some level.
Questioning in such a way is a concept that someone in that culture, especially young people can't even grasp. Words are redefined, as many different bloggers showed in the Learning the Words project organized by Samantha of Defeating the Dragons.
It's a deliberate tactic to keep their children in the fold (hopefully for life), and it bears an uncanny resemblance to Newspeak in the book 1984, a new language designed for the people of the empire of Oceania, whose main goal was to make dissent impossible. Here's an excerpt from chapter 5 of 1984 where the main character, Winston, a government clerk, is talking to Syme, a clerk responsible for helping to create Newspeak dictionaries:
(Syme is speaking in this conversation):
'Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to
narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime
literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express
it. Every concept that can ever be needed, will be expressed by exactly
one word, with its meaning rigidly defined and all its subsidiary
meanings rubbed out and forgotten.
'By 2050 earlier, probably -- all real knowledge of
Oldspeak will have disappeared. The whole literature of the past will
have been destroyed. Chaucer, Shakespeare, Milton, Byron -- they'll
exist only in Newspeak versions, not merely changed into something
different, but actually changed into something contradictory of what
they used to be. Even the literature of the Party will change. Even the
slogans will change. How could you have a slogan like "freedom is
slavery" when the concept of freedom has been abolished? The whole
climate of thought will be different. In fact there will be no thought,
as we understand it now. Orthodoxy means not thinking -- not needing to
think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness.'
George Orwell was right, orthodoxy is unconsciousness, it's believing without thinking. That is the goal of this kind of thinking, people who believe without sincerely questioning. They think this will result in children growing up to believe it as a matter of fact for the rest of their lives without questioning it.
The problem is, at some point, a person, has to become an adult, they have to be able to work outside the home, they will end up moving out, and having unbelieving neighbors and co-workers, or maybe just simply people who are Christians, but not as extreme as them. At some point, this exposure to the outside world will become overwhelming to them.
They will be for the first time, forced people who don't look, act, think like they do, forced to face the reality that exists outside of the narrow confines of the world they grew up in. It automatically either forces them to retreat into a lonely shell, or make them face questions that they never had before, which is a highly emotional process that they don't quite know how to deal with, because they have never been able to honestly question before.
They don't know what to believe, or what to think of the world around them, because they have never experienced it before. Suddenly the canned response they were taught to give in response to challenges to the faith (lovingly called apologetic in the world) seem to be falling short in response to this new internal struggle. They will be forced to re evaluate everything they have been taught, and decide for themselves what they truly believe.
For some, they will end up coming back to fundamentalism somehow, and more determined to be a "better Christian", but most will either come back to Christianity in a more moderate form, it give it up all together, the experience will lead to their former fundamentalist beliefs collapsing like a house of cards.
The parents who wanted to try to keep their children in the faith by isolating them don't realize that realize that their tactics are back firing on them, creating a generation of former fundamentalist who have given it all up, and who realize just how toxic that belief system is, people like me and Lana Hobbs, Jonny Scaramanga, and Samantha Field, just to name a few.
In trying to create a army of fundamentalist foot soliders who follow orders, and believe what they are told without objection or question, they have actually created toxic fundamentalism's worst enemy: A generation of people willing to tell the truth about fundamentalism.